American Composers Orchestra

about the concert

Buy Tickets Online:
CarnegieCharge
or call
212-247-7800

Program Notes
Interview: Orchestra Underground...Beyond the Surface by Frank J. Oteri
Article: Blue Skies and Balmy...Composer Lisa Bielawa discusses the evolution of The Right Weather, by Molly Sheridan


top
homepage
concert schedule


 

 

 

 

 

Buy Tickets Online:
CarnegieCharge
or call
212-247-7800

Program Notes
Interview: Orchestra Underground...Beyond the Surface by Frank J. Oteri
Article: Blue Skies and Balmy...Composer Lisa Bielawa discusses the evolution of The Right Weather, by Molly Sheridan


top
homepage
concert schedule


 

 

 

 

 

Buy Tickets Online:
CarnegieCharge
or call
212-247-7800

Program Notes
Interview: Orchestra Underground...Beyond the Surface by Frank J. Oteri
Article: Blue Skies and Balmy...Composer Lisa Bielawa discusses the evolution of The Right Weather, by Molly Sheridan


top
homepage
concert schedule


 

 

 

 

 

Making Gotham

Michael Gordon and Ridge Theater, an urban collaboration

By Kathleen Watt

American Composers Orchestra launches its Orchestra Underground debut concert at Zankel Hall February 27 with two world premieres that take advantage of new hall’s unique facilities. One of two world premieres commissioned for the event is Gotham, a 35-minute multimedia work that takes the city of New York as both its subject and its leading lady. Growing out of the notion of New York-as-hometown, Gotham is a personalized portrayal of this particular place—its back streets and its minutiae, its dreams, and its detritus—seeking to reclaim New York for those who live and work here. In so doing, Gotham becomes a map of the urban inner landscape for any city-dweller of the 21st century.

“Every commission comes with a set of parameters that involves compromise. Never does someone come to a composer and say ‘write anything you want for any combination of instruments, and tell me exactly what you would like the concert situation to be like’...,” said composer Michael Gordon, co-founder of the Bang on a Can organization. Then American Composers Orchestra did just that. Of his ACO commission, for which Gordon proposed a collaboration with New York’s Ridge Theater, he now laughs, “It’s about as close to [perfect] as you’re ever going to come.”

The Gotham project reunites Gordon with Ridge Theater filmmaker Bill Morrison, visual artist Laurie Olinder, and director Bob McGrath. The same team created Decasia, the spectacularly successful 2001-multimedia experience now acclaimed from Basel to Edinburgh, to BAM and Sundance. Gotham is structured along the Decasia model, incorporating projections, re-edited archival film, multi-tiered sets, and musicians who sometimes seem actually to inhabit the projected environment. The prospect that the team may do with the theme of New York City what they have done in Decasia is exhilarating, and, in some ways, harrowing.

“I wanted people to feel an aching sense that time was passing and that it was too beautiful to hold onto,” said filmmaker Bill Morrison. One critic compares Decasia’s “shimmering dreams and fantasies” to “Etienne-Jules Marey’s experiments in chronophotography…radically transformed—their beauty fully intact—in [the] Surrealist collages Max Ernst [made of them]…. A complex allegory for human experience ensues: knowledge is pursued, machines achieve manic ascendance, seduction spawns violence, disasters rain down…life begins anew.”
All the team members agree that Decasia broke new ground for them. “With Decasia we moved away from being responsible to anything other than our creative idea,” explained Gordon. “There’s no pressure for us to deliver anything that anybody in the world can exploit.” He added, “It’s sort of our fantasy….”

By all accounts this foursome has discovered a formula for artistic collaboration that avoids the notorious acrimony of close collaboration, unlocks the potential of each collaborator, and magnifies it exponentially. Happy creative marriages throughout history are far outnumbered by cantankerous partnerships among musicians, architects, librettists, and city planners…. How do the Gotham collaborators account for their success?

Michael Gordon has lamented that “people think artists pull down their inspiration from another world, maybe heaven, [which] is pure and uncorrupted…And this purity somehow is contained by the artist him or herself….” Still, listening to this team try to distill the essence of their fruitfulness, one senses a bounty of preternatural gifts—maybe from heaven—and something like a divine authenticity.

“The main thing is, we all really like each other,” says Ridge Theater artistic director Bob McGrath, “and we’re all really good at what we do. We respect each other. We don’t get in each other’s way. And if we do disagree, we find a way to work it out.”

In fact, the artists on the Gotham team admire each other’s work unequivocally. Asked about the thunderous visual impact of Decasia, filmmaker Bill Morrison says, “Let’s be clear: it’s the music that is the driving narrative of these works….Michael Gordon’s incredible score…holds the emotional dynamics of the piece.” “We each have different jobs to do,” adds visual artist Laurie Olinder.

Gordon adds, “The thing that’s so much fun about working with Bill and Bob and Laurie is that the [end] result is the greatest thing I’ve ever seen.” Of American Composers Orchestra, Gordon says, “This group is incredible…[ACO] was willing to dedicate huge amounts of time to put this together. It’s almost unimaginable [for a composer] to have that kind of experience…”

McGrath reiterates, “I just respect these other three artists so much—it’s an honor to work with them on each and every project.”

Every marriage should be so sanguine. But what about the nuts and bolts? There is, in fact, a procedural scaffolding, on three distinct tiers, and it all begins with—what else? A meeting.

The difference, says Morrison, is that “other collaborators have tons of meetings and nothing gets done. We have very few meetings and a ton gets done. Our meetings are always very efficient. Especially our creative ones…”

“And not too many meetings,” echoes Olinder, stressing that “if you hold onto your ideas too tightly….” She trails off, confirming with her earnest expression that budding ideas can be ineffably fragile.

“We come together on an aesthetic,” says Gordon, a sort of Uberkonzept that arises out of an initial jam session, and excites each artist individually.

In this instance, in the afterglow of Decasia’s reception at festivals around the world, the four found themselves reflecting on the city, which on September 11, 2001, had itself become symbolic of that film’s profound meditation on decay, death, and rebirth. “Decasia seeks to show cycles,” Morrison had written, “…the birth of a new type of being, separate from the old one…spiritual rebirth…souls waiting to re-enter new bodies….” They wonder as a group, and to a man, at the peculiar coincidences between the work—which both immerses and streams through the artists—and the condition of the city environment where they were doing the work, in September 2001. Thus the broad concept of “hometown New York” emerged, and Gotham was conceived.

So goes the first meeting, where the broad strokes are laid in. Then the artists retire to their studios, where the true collaboration begins. Facing the materials of their respective disciplines, they cast wide and gather up the bits and pieces of visual montage, found film and sound pastiche. Image upon image, color and light, natural element upon fabricated form, tone upon sound, design upon discovery, time upon space—a colloquy is engaged. Over a decade of working together, they have developed a fluency that ensures transparent communication, and the trust so critical to any collaboration, freeing each to work independently, within a governing aesthetic.

On their second collaborative tier, the team will convene to share the seeds of each other’s creative process. Each artist gingerly bares a fledgling design. These meetings are both tender and bracing, characterized by much kindness, deference, and mutual awe.

Morrison explains, “[Bob] will say, ‘How could you make a film that somehow relates to this?’ Or, ‘Remember that idea you were talking about, the evolution film? Don’t you think that would work here?’”

"I spit out my two cents’ worth,” answers McGrath. “If it’s helpful, good, and if it’s not, ignore me! There may be tiny bits of friction,” he grants, “but we just work it out. It all kind of just flows, like a river to the ocean….it just kind of goes….”

In the Ridge Theater OBIE-award winning production of Jennie Richee, for example, Olinder’s view of the lead character as a “violently disturbed man,” seems at odds with playwright Mac Wellman’s view of the “profound moralist.” Asked about this potentially incendiary disparity, Olinder answers, “The subject of [Jennie Richee] is so vast…In our little microcosm, my opinion and Mac’s do not cancel each other out. I don’t disagree with Mac, [and Mac] can’t say that [the subject] isn’t violent.”

To this Morrison exclaims, “It’s the inherent contradiction that’s so compelling.”

Olinder and Morrison erupt in a riff about scrims and scrims within scrims. They all mention magic. “We love that magical quality,” says McGrath, “of making the audience feel that they have x-ray eyes, that they can see through the image into the orchestra or the performer...” And they talk easily about spirituality, which threads like a theme through the titles in their collective resume. “There’s been a type of spirituality [in] the ones we choose, the ones that choose us,” reflects Morrison, “spirituality at all costs, defying logic….”

Certainly this team defies a logical expectation of clashing egos. How then have they escaped the logistical disasters that run so many collaborations aground?

“We’ve made disaster the theme of our projects,” laughs Morrison.

So continues the collaboration. In infrequent meetings the artists come together to keep their course true, with long rich periods of creative gestation and hard work in between. The team eschews the suggestion either that A.) it imposes design upon nature, or that B.) design happens by accident in their process. Instead they imply an artist’s intuition about beauty—it’s there all the time. You know it when you see it. You see it when your internal instrument is in tune, and tuned in. So in separate studios the artists tune in, and the work grows in all its inevitable dimensions toward the day it will be assembled.

"Working with Bob and Laurie is like walking on air. We never know if it’s going to come together until tech week. And then miraculously it does, and sometimes in the most uncanny way,” muses Morrison. “You know, John Lennon said when he was a Beatle he felt like he was part of a single mind….”

McGrath adds, “It is a pure thing. It feels very natural, very organic when we work.”

When the group brings their new work for orchestra and projections to Zankel Hall they will be embracing a new collaborator—the venue itself—more intimately than ever before. Olinder’s visuals and Morrison’s film will be projected not onto the multiple scrims that they typically favor, but onto the walls of the hall. Offered a choice of two possible projection surfaces—both of them rectangular—Olinder and Morrison started looking for ways to turn a limitation to their advantage. Olinder brightens as she explains the capacity of digital technology to custom fit her images to projection surfaces, rendering them perceptually one.

“I start to see [limitations] as the Form,” says Morrison, and all together they hail the “good fortune” of Zankel’s beautiful blonde walls, as though the walls themselves had been designed for Gotham.

There will be other new elements in Gotham. Gordon’s orchestration calls for amplified instruments. How well Zankel will accommodate amplification remains to be heard, writes music critic Terry Teachout. “Amplification is an art, not a science,” to be arrived at over time, and not by technology alone.

Then there’s the matter of Manhattan’s subway trains. Just nine feet of bedrock stand between their seismic roar and Zankel’s underground audience.

Gordon crows, “No one’s gonna hear the subway!” True to the hard rock heritage of its generation, the group bursts into a paean to volume. “I’m into visceral music! I like to feel it! It’s gotta be loud!”

The third and arguably most crucial stage of the collaboration is the presentation of the work to the audience—which, for this team, means an invitation to the audience to become the final collaborator.
McGrath puts it this way: “We really gravitate toward things that are kind of open-ended in nature—either images or ideas or sound—so that interpretations by the audience can be grafted on. So a lot of the conception of the piece goes on within the mind and psyche of each individual that watches it.”

“I love talking to the audience after a performance,” Olinder interjects. “I find out so many things I hadn’t known about the piece!”

“Audience members say, ‘That was the most amazing thing…what was it about?’” confesses Gordon. “But there’s room for that. The more tangible the thing you’re involved in, the less room there is for you to use your own imagination…”

McGrath reflects. “The answer to why it works is kind of a mystery. The times have kind of demanded this. We try to make art that we would like to see, [and] we are of an age where we wanted to put visuals on music. It’s just a natural progression of things in the culture, and we’re just responding to it. We’re leading it, and we’re responding to it.”

One thing seems clear. Gotham will not be fully accomplished until we’ve heard it, seen it—and brought our experience to it, and made our collaborative contribution. They’re serious about this—pure and inspired—“maybe from heaven.”

Kathleen Watt writes frequently on the performing arts. Visit KEWatt.com.


  top | homepage | concert schedule